comp.lang.c++ Google Group

Re: SIGKILL

2010-03-17T23:14:54Z

Now I got a "child terminated with signal 9" on the shell.... what
does that mean, any clues? :o
Sems to be something from pthread but uhm... :-?
Thanks,

Re: Using own class as key in map causes segmentation fault

2010-03-17T23:02:11Z

Alf already covered the solution to the code you posted. Unless your key
class does something more, then you could replace it with a simple
vector<string>:
int main()
{
map<vector<string>,int> test;

vector<string> s1;
s1.push_back("3");
s1.push_back("6");
test[s1]++;

vector<string> s2;

Re: SIGKILL

2010-03-17T22:16:55Z

it is declared as a private std::string in the header.
Worth a try....

Re: SIGKILL

2010-03-17T21:32:01Z

What is PIDMessageBuf ? Where is it defined? How is it defined?
Is it defined?
What happens if you output to cout instead of PIDfile?

Re: SIGKILL

2010-03-17T21:01:59Z

Well, it was run in gdb but gdb doesn't say anything else than SIGKILL
either and after the sigkill you can't make a backtrace cause the app
terminated...
How would I get a core dump that i can do something with? :o

Re: Different results from different gcc versions

2010-03-17T20:45:02Z

Why? Perhaps there is a good reason, but I would question until I got
that good reason.

Re: SIGKILL

2010-03-17T20:28:51Z

<snip>
Get them to either a) send you a core or b) run the code in a debugger
and give you a shout when it aborts.

SIGKILL

2010-03-17T20:20:43Z

Hi There,
I had to add a certain portion of code to an application which had
been considered to run stable (bewfore my addition). Now the QA guy
came back to me saying that he's seeing a SIGKILL after a while
(several hours) since my code addition. The code I added simply writes
a string (PIDMessageBuf - declared private) and a at runtime generated

Re: VS 2005 died on template (part II)

2010-03-17T19:41:38Z

What does "died" mean in this case? The above code is illegal,
and shouldn't compile (regardless of which version of A you
define).

Re: Include header files in quotes or less-than greater-than signs?

2010-03-17T18:39:03Z

On Mar 16, 9:27 am, Dwight Army of Champions
The difference is just the naming convention. Another one you might
find is ".hpp". Under the hood they are all the same thing, headers.
Most likely they are the name of header files sitting on your machine
somewhere.
The C standard library has a lot of header files ending in .h, e.g.

Re: Is allocating large objects on the stack a good practice?

2010-03-17T17:28:05Z

17.4.3.1.2/1
-- Each name that contains a double underscore (__) or begins with an
underscore followed by an uppercase letter is reserved to the
implementation for any use.
-- Each name that begins with an underscore is reserved to the
implementation
for use as a name in the global namespace.

===Welcome to comp.lang.c++! Read this first.

2010-03-17T16:30:13Z

Welcome to comp.lang.c++! Read this first.
This post is intended to give the new reader an introduction to reading
and posting in this newsgroup. We respectfully request that you read
all the way through this post, as it helps make for a more pleasant
and useful group for everyone.
First of all, please keep in mind that comp.lang.c++ is a group for discussion

Re: Is allocating large objects on the stack a good practice?

2010-03-17T14:19:38Z

It's possible to write C code which doesn't leak. And in the cases where
you could use a stack-based array (i.e. where you only need the memory
for the duration of the function), it isn't very difficult to avoid leaks.
Where avoiding leaks is hard is where you return pointers to dynamically
allocated memory and then have to keep track of whether or not it's being

Re: Using own class as key in map causes segmentation fault

2010-03-17T14:03:30Z

There is also a copy of the entire vector in the constructor!!!
HTH

Re: Is allocating large objects on the stack a good practice?

2010-03-17T12:22:46Z

For C, "All identifiers that begin with an underscore are
always reserved for use as identifiers with file scope in both
the ordinary and tag name spaces." (7.1.3p1). So you could use
`_init' inside a function, but not as a name for anything outside
a function. In particular, since "a higher-level routine" would