I don't chew my cabbage twice, Emperor Wonko the Sane <d...@sorensensdomain.net>
> On Oct 21, 8:13 pm, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del > <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤®@Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤®.net> wrote: >> This just in:
>> If the Autards had scored more points than the Tigers they >> would have won the game. It's true, really, it is.
>> Oh yeah, if the Autards had not been horribly cheated by the >> ref's they would have won too. That is a given.
> Has anyone ever mentioned that the nickname "Autard" is by far > the lamest derogatory nickname in the histery of the interwebs?
I know that a few have politely requested its retirement. Some of us find it personally offensive for reasons that have nothing to do with Auburn or football.
-- wjlmuttatyeahwhodotcom
"I before E except after C, and E before N in chicken"
On Oct 22, 7:19 pm, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤®@Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del
¤®.net> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:11:37 GMT, Bill Lang
>> for reasons that have nothing to do with > >Auburn or football.
> Get your priorities straight. Autards are tough, they aren't precious > little flowers like some of the more effeminate posters seem to think.
Fuckwit can't read, either.
With all due respect to my Auburn friends, I really don't a give a flaming flying rat's ass about Auburn football. I am not speaking on behalf of the Auburnites. However, I do know that the number of persons in this chatroom with autistic, down's, or otherwise mentally challenged family members is not a negligible number. This is a fact you have been made aware of in the past.
Thank you for cementing my opinion about Bama nation. Ignorant, insensitive dick cheeses who post their unarchived drivel behind anonymity.
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:59:07 -0500, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤®@Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤®.net> wrote: >I have a handicapped sister. She has cerebral palsy due to my mother >using defective birth control measures. I know as much or more than >any of you about handicapped persons.
I find that highly unlikely. And given your continued use of the term, disgusting.
...I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. - Stephen Roberts
¤®.net> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:34:10 -0700, Va Beach Hokie <wjlm...@yahoo.com> > wrote:
> >On Oct 22, 7:19 pm, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤®@Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del > >¤®.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:11:37 GMT, Bill Lang
> >>> for reasons that have nothing to do with > >> >Auburn or football.
> >> Get your priorities straight. Autards are tough, they aren't precious > >> little flowers like some of the more effeminate posters seem to think.
> >Fuckwit can't read, either.
> >With all due respect to my Auburn friends, I really don't a give a > >flaming flying rat's ass about Auburn football. I am not speaking on > >behalf of the Auburnites. However, I do know that the number of > >persons in this chatroom with autistic, down's, or otherwise mentally > >challenged family members is not a negligible number. This is a fact > >you have been made aware of in the past.
> >Thank you for cementing my opinion about Bama nation. Ignorant, > >insensitive dick cheeses who post their unarchived drivel behind > >anonymity.
> I am no more anonymous than you are, anal probing miscarriage. Autards > are not autistic as far as I can tell, some of them may be, but that > is not my concern.
> I have a handicapped sister. She has cerebral palsy due to my mother > using defective birth control measures. I know as much or more than > any of you about handicapped persons. I am talking about real > handicapped persons, which are physically handicapped people. People > who can't walk, can't talk, rely on you for their every need, etc...
A coat hanger technically isn't a birth control device, Bammer
> Big fucking deal, some of you have children with autism. That is not > the worst thing in the world, believe me. Quit using your children or > your relatives to attempt to gain an upper hand on a freaking Usenet > group.
> Autards are cum bubbles with legs who disgust me. I will continue to > call them Autards and if you don't like it, big deal. I will tell you > what is worse than an Autard though. A person that uses a handicapped > person as a crutch in a Usenet group to attempt to give them some sort > of moral high ground. That is worse than most Autards would stoop > too.
Fine, then I shall return to simply ignoring you. Kiss your sister for me, I'm sure she's a sweet girl. (No tongue!, Bammer)
|
